Important Notice Brian DiBella has left the firm. Gary Gomola and all of the other staff
members We are now located at 213 Court Street,
Suite 204, Middletown CT 06457
CLIENT ALERT - WINTER 2003The information contained in this newsletter is designed to keep our clients and friends informed of developments and ideas which we feel are important. Should any subjects be of interest please call one of us. The articles contained in this newsletter are not intended as a substitute for legal, accounting or tax advice. You should seek professional advice on the particular issues which concern you. Protecting Start Up Expense Deductions Are you thinking about expanding or
starting a new business? You are probably
going to incur many expenses related to your new business.
Maybe you'll
be conducting market and facilities surveys. You might engage a lawyer and accountant to
set up a corporation or LLC. Advertising for
the opening of the business and salaries for employees in training may have to be paid. These are obviously deductible business expenses,
right? Not so, says the IRS. In fact, the IRS considers expenses that are
incurred before your business begins as nondeductible. Luckily, taxpayers are allowed to make an
election to write-off these start-up costs over a period of 60 months or more, once they
actually start the business. How do you make
this election? You must attach Form 4562 and
an accompanying election statement to the return for the first tax year you are in
business. Even if the IRS later
decided that you were too aggressive in deducting expenses, and reclassifies operating
expenses as start up expenses, the election will cover these as well. If the election is not timely made, the
expenses will never be deductible. Such an
oversight can be costly. Naturally, the rule to disallow the
deduction of start-up expenses does not apply once the business actually starts. Once the business has begun, those types of
expenses are considered "ordinary
and necessary"
and are fully deductible. Who determines when
the business has actually started? The IRS
often tries to "push
back"
a new business'
start date. If they can successfully claim
that your business actually began in an earlier year than you determined, your right to
make the election to amortize would be lost, and with it, your tax deductions. What if you incur expenses to research a
new business venture and reach the conclusion that now is not the best time to start? Or what if you wanted to buy an existing
business and the deal never went through? If
you are an individual, these expenditures may not be deductible, and even if they are,
they are considered miscellaneous itemized deductions which are only allowed when they
exceed 2% of your adjusted gross income, and are subject to the various phase out limits.
For this reason, if you are contemplating making some substantial expenditures, we
recommend that you consider forming a small business corporation or LLC. Since the organizations are presumed to be engaged
in an activity for profit, they do not have to meet the requirements that individuals do
to prove that an expense is related to a for-profit activity. If a company incurs expenses in investigating a
new venture, and later abandons the search, the owners would be entitled to an ordinary
loss deduction. As you can see, it's important to keep records of your startup expenses and, when necessary, make the proper election. Written by Tanis M. Crosby, CPA - Senior Accountant taniac@ctcpas.com Clean Auto Tax Breaks Several tax provisions in the Internal
Revenue Code have been designed to encourage the production and use of environmentally
friendly vehicles. A 10 percent credit of up
to $4,000 has been available for the cost of an electric vehicle since 1993. Also since 1993, an above the line deduction of up
to $2,000 for the cost of an automobile has been available for the purchase of a qualified
clean-fuel vehicle. These environmentally
friendly provisions in the code have, up until this point, not been widely utilized. However, car manufacturers are starting to make hybrid gasoline and electric vehicles that promise to be much more popular with consumers. The IRS has recently certified three models of hybrid vehicles to qualify for the $2,000 deduction described above. These are the Toyota Prius, Honda Insight and Honda Civic Hybrid. Other manufacturers have hybrid vehicles in the works, but they have not yet received IRS certification. The Toyota Prius and Honda Insight models have been certified for the 2001, 2002 and 2003 model years; and the Honda Civic Hybrid for its new 2003 model. You can amend your 2000 or 2001 tax return to claim this deduction for vehicles purchased in those years. The $2,000 deduction is an above the line deduction, meaning that taxpayers do not have to itemize to claim this deduction. If you have already purchased a hybrid
vehicle or have been considering it, these special tax incentives could make that decision
easier. Please call our office if you have
any questions on these rules.
Important Changes In Split Dollar Insurance If you are a party to a split-dollar life insurance
arrangement you must take some action during 2003. The IRS has issued regulations that change the way
split-dollar life insurance will be treated for income tax purposes. They will be taxed either as an economic benefit,
or as loan transactions. We occasionally find
that our clients have entered into split-dollar arrangements, and have not told us about
it. Accordingly, they may not be properly
reflected on the company books. The new regulations define a split-dollar
life insurance arrangement broadly as any arrangement between a life insurance contract
owner and a non-owner, under which either party pays all or part of the premiums. And the
party paying the premium is entitled to recover, conditionally or unconditionally, all or
part of the premiums, with that recovery to be made from, or secured by a contract. If the arrangement is connected with the
performance of services or stock ownership, a split-dollar arrangement is any arrangement
where one party pays all or part of the premiums, and the beneficiary or the death benefit
is designated by the employee. This
definition pulls in arrangements where the payer is not entitled to recover any premiums. The details of the new taxation
consequences are much too complicated to cover in this article. The major points are that they must be properly
accounted for. The employee must include the
economic benefit of the insurance protection in income annually, and that
currently existing collateral assignment arrangements must be terminated by Tax Credits For Hiring Employees This could be your last chance to take
advantage of two tax credits that are scheduled to expire, but are still available for the
2002 and 2003 tax years. The Work Opportunity Tax Credit is available on an elective basis for employers hiring individuals from one of seven targeted groups. The credit percentage is 25% of qualified wages if the hours of service are at least 120 hours but less than 400 hours and 40% if the hours are 400 or more. Qualified wages are wages for service for a one year period beginning with the day the individual begins work. Generally, no more than $6,000 of wages can be taken per individual, and therefore, the maximum credit per individual can be $2,400. Also the tax deduction for wages is reduced by the amount of the credit. An individual is not treated as a member
of a targeted group unless the employer receives a written certification from the
Department of Labor, or completes a pre-screening notice that is submitted to the DOL
within 21 days of the date of hire. We have
the pre-screening notice form in our office if you would like a copy of it. The form describes in more detail the seven
targeted groups that are eligible for the credit. Another similar tax credit is the Welfare to Work Credit. This credit is on the first $20,000 of eligible
wages paid to qualified long term family assistance recipients during the first two years
of employment. The credit is 35% of the first
$10,000 of wages in the first year of employment and 50% of the first $10,000 of wages in
the second year of employment. Thus, the
maximum credit is $8,500 per employee. If the
welfare-to-work credit is allowed for an individual for a tax year that employer may not
also take a work opportunity credit for that individual for that year. Like the work opportunity tax credit, an employer
must receive written certification for the employee or complete the pre-screening notice. Please call our office if you have any questions on these credits or would like additional information. .Written by Brian C. DiBella, CPA, - Partner briand@ctcpas.com Increased Qualified Plan Contributions For the 2002 tax year there are
substantial increases in the allowable contributions to qualified business retirement
plans. For defined contribution plans (commonly
referred to as profit sharing plans) and SEP plans (simplified employee pension plans) the
maximum percentage of eligible wages that can be contributed has been increased from 15%
to 25%. The maximum earnings that can be
included in eligible wages, per employee, has been increased from $170,000 to $200,000. The maximum contribution for any one employee has
increased from $35,000 to $40,000. The limit on elective deferrals to 401(k) and 403(b) plans has increased from $10,500 to $11,000, and if the employee is over 50 years of age, they can add an additional contribution of $1,000. For SIMPLE plans the deferral limit amount is $7,000, or $7,500 if over 50. If
you are considering a qualified plan for your business, we would be happy to discuss your
situation with you. Deducting Rent Paid To A Related Party Many businesses rent their facilities from the businesss owner, family member, or a related LLC. In general, of course, this rent paid on business property is deductible. In fact, the tax code doesnt even specifically state that the rent must be reasonable as it does for other deductions. However, the IRS does closely scrutinize transactions between related parties, and if the rent paid to a related party is considered unreasonable the deduction will be reduced. In some cases, the excessive rent has been re-characterized as a distribution of profits or a gift, depending upon the situation. There are some steps you can take at the inception of the rental arrangement to demonstrate that the rent paid is reasonable. One method is to show that what your business pays is in line with rent paid by unrelated parties for property that is similar to yours. The most common way to determine fair rental values is by contacting independent realtors or brokers to get appraisals based on comparable properties. If the appraised fair rental values are below the amount you were hoping to charge, you may be able to justify setting a higher rent by showing that rates of return for your particular industry run higher than in others. You may be able to show that your property should be valued higher because of special features or specific improvements, perhaps even a specialized location. In situations such as these, be sure to carefully document the rationale. Any rental arrangement you make should be written down in a formal lease and properly executed. Taxpayers often feel they can relax when dealing with a related party because they dont anticipate future legal challenges. From a tax standpoint, however, its even more important to undertake the proper formalities for these transactions in the event the IRS seeks to disregard them. In several cases, rent paid to a related party has been disallowed because it wasnt required under a formal lease. Be sure to consider tax planning for any rental agreements with related parties. It can take just a few moments to review your formal rental agreement (or to put one in place) and you will be in a better position to show that the rent paid in your transaction is reasonable and fully deductible. Written by Tanis M. Crosby, CPA - Senior Accountant taniac@ctcpas.com The articles contained in this newsletter are not intended as a substitute for legal, accounting or tax advice. You should seek professional advice on the particular issues which concern you. Edited by Gary R. Gomola, CPA, CVA January 2003 Home | About Us | Our Staff | Newsletters | Links |